Photo courtesy http://www.rob-matthews.com
This bound version of Wikipedia contains only the featured articles from Wikipedia. It obviously does not encompass all of Wikipedia. If it did, it would stand as tall as . . .well, a tree.
Wednesday, June 10, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
In relation to this, Wikipedia is oft maligned for the inaccuracy of its content, I wonder how the Encyclopedia Brittanica stacks up against it in terms of %errors?
ReplyDeleteI'd love to have a leather-bound Wikipedia. Such a tangible paradox.
ReplyDelete@ Stephen Holmes: according to Nature, it averages out to 2.92 mistakes per article for Britannica and 3.86 for Wikipedia.
Hi Kas,
ReplyDeleteI found your article http://www.mactech.com/articles/mactech/Vol.15/15.06/FastBlitStrategies/index.html searching the web.
I would like to know where I can get the BlitsKrieg code that you named at the end of the article. You can send me more info at alexander_quinones_AT_gmx_DOT_de.
Thanks in advance for your help!
Best wishes,
Alex