Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
Close

Saturday, January 10, 2015

Where Are the Schizophrenia Genes?

Schizophrenia is another one of those conditions (like alcoholism) that we're constantly being told is highly heritable, based on the results of twin studies and various other findings (from studies that pre-date the DNA-sequencing era). Studies "proving" the heritability of schizophrenia are, in general, rarely questioned, or even reviewed critically, due to the fact that a genetic basis for schizophrenia makes so much intuitive sense and agrees so well with ordinary experience. Everybody knows someone who "has schizophrenia in their family," and it very much does seem to travel in families.

The fact that something travels in families is not automatically indicative of a genetic connection, but most people aren't ready to believe such a thing since it goes against common sense. Nevetheless, in the past few decades, a great deal of work (much of it quite compelling) has gone into the study of things like intergenerational trauma, with researchers finding, for example, that the course of PTSD in modern-day Israeli military veterans is much different for soldiers whose parents or grandparents were Holocaust survivors. (I talk about intergenerational trauma in Of Two Minds. In fact, there's a whole chapter on Trauma.)

Social workers and criminologists have known for years that childhood physical and sexual abuse tend to be intergenerational. Yet no one seriously suggests there's a "child abuse gene" or a "child molestation gene." A lot of things that aren't purely genetic are trans-generational; familial. Schizophrenia itself may be in this category. The links between childhood trauma and schizophrenia are quite strong and well known. Indeed, the literature shows that the associations between childhood trauma and schizophrenia are actually as strong as or stronger than the associations between childhood trauma and other disorders that we know have a high correspondence to childhood trauma (including depression, PTSD, anxiety disorders, dissociative disorders, eating disorders, personality disorders, substance abuse, and sexual dysfunction, among others).

Still, the search for "schizophrenia genes" goes on, and every so often we hear claims for this or that group of scientists having discovered some new genetic feature that confers high risk for schizophrenia. The latest of these reports comes from the Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, which published a piece in Nature Letters in July 2014 called "Biological insights from 108 schizophrenia-associated genetic loci." The report trumpets the finding of "108 conservatively defined loci that meet genome-wide significance, 83 of which have not been previously reported." This is a genome-wide association study, subject to the usual GWAS caveats.

Of the 108 loci, 75% were associated with protein-coding genes, a very high number for a GWAS study, and quite a few genes involve physiologically relevant functions.

On the surface, it sounds promising.

Where things start to fall down is in determining how much heritability risk the 108 loci can account for. The authors said: "Assuming a liability-threshold model, a lifetime risk of 1%, independent SNP effects, and adjusting for case-control ascertainment, RPS" (risk profile scores) "now explain about 7% of variation on the liability scale to schizophrenia across the samples, about half of which (3.4%) is explained by genome-wide significant loci." To parse that: We know the lifetime risk of schizophrenia is 1%. If we total up the disease risk attributable to all of the 128 markers found in the study, we can explain 7% of schizophrenia risk. But if we limit ourselves to the 108 markers that met criteria for genome-wide significance (a stringent test intended to reduce the risk of false positives), we can explain only a little more than 3% of schizophrenia risk.

So once again, it's a mixed bag: a genome-wide association study (GWAS) that's filled with interesting findings (some of which may prove to be important), but that fails, quite miserably, to explain heritability.

Many people have commented on the possible reasons why genome-wide association studies have been hit-or-miss in their ability to explain heritability, why they so often find SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) that don't map to genes, why the results often don't replicate well, etc. I think if we're honest, we have to admit that GWAS isn't always the right tool for the job. It's a great tool, but you have to remember how it works. GWAS attempts to match fairly common (i.e., occurring in 1% or more of the population) single nucleotide polymorphisms (which you can think of as point mutations) in databases that have been specially built to accommodate the most common polymorphisms. In a GWAS, you aren't doing deep sequencing of people's genes; you're looking for markers that cover a rather tiny percent of the genome. These markers occur commonly, which almost by definition prevents them from being very serious defects, because serious genetic defects are rendered rare by evolution (natural selection removes them from the gene pool over time). Therefore, in a technique that, by design, looks mainly at commonly occurring SNPs, which are overwhelmingly neutral (from an evolutionary standpoint), we should not be surprised to find that the markers that get spotted in GWAS (as genome-wide significant) are essentially neutral mutations without much phenotypic effect.

Unfortunately, we're at an awkward point in the history of science, because technology has given us some powerful DNA analysis tools (and the computers needed to crunch the data), but we're not quite yet at the point where detailed, deep genetic sequencing of whole human genomes is economically feasible for a study that includes, say, a thousand cases and a thousand controls. (Right now, it costs about $10,000 to do the necessary sequencing.) When a human genome can be reliably sequenced for under $2000, we'll have the tools to do really serious, deep genetic studies of hard-to-pin-down diseases. Whether we'll have the computer power needed to do the necessary statistical analysis on the scale of large (N > 1000) case-control studies is another matter; remember that in GWAS we're dealing with perhaps 500,000 data points per genome whereas in deep sequencing we're generating billions of data points per genome. It'll probably be doable using Amazon AWS/EC2 infrastructure (or Google's compute-cloud). Another reason to invest in Amazon, probably.

I'm in the process of writing a 100,000-word book on mental illness. It's evidence-based; part science, part memoir, with over 200 footnotes (so you can refer to the scientific literature yourself). To follow the progress of the book, check back here often, and also consider adding your name to our mailing list. Thanks!

9 comments:

  1. Upon reading your article, I can't help but think that if they understood statistics, people would not make the mistake of thinking that twin studies or GWAS prove a genetic link. Neither has the statistical power to exclude other causes/links.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Family therapists witnessed recovered patients return to their prior state when they rejoined their family. Some spouses showed signs of mental illness when the schizophrenic recovered also. See writing of Carl Whittaker.
    Darlene Lancer, LMFT
    Author of "Codependency for Dummies"
    http://whatiscodependency.com

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Triggers. I can say that it's best for me to keep family at a distance i.e. father and sisters.

      Delete
  3. Schizophrenia develops as a result of being a victim of a psychopath. Psychopathy runs in families. Correlation?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I believe it is caused by childhood trauma and adult trauma as well.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Am one of the happiest Father on earth,My son onces suffered from the problem Schizophrenia which made him not to go to school,and that was killing his educational carrier.he can not control his emotions,always having nosies on his head affect how he thinks, feels and acts,he has taken different medication,but no cure,then i got the contact of a doctor who helped my son. he gave me the medication which my son used, he took the medication for two weeks,and that was the end of the problem.he can now control his emotions,no more severely distorted self-image and feeling worthless acts, his thinking is normal and no more voices on his head any more.any one that need his medication should contact the Doctor on benardleo13@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  6. Am one of the happiest Father on earth,My son onces suffered from the problem Schizophrenia which made him not to go to school,and that was killing his educational carrier.he can not control his emotions,always having nosies on his head affect how he thinks, feels and acts,he has taken different medication,but no cure,then i got the contact of a doctor who helped my son. he gave me the medication which my son used, he took the medication for two weeks,and that was the end of the problem.he can now control his emotions,no more severely distorted self-image and feeling worthless acts, his thinking is normal and no more voices on his head any more.any one that need his medication should contact the Doctor on benardleo13@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  7. This is good news to all, My son who has F23.1 type of Schizophrenia is finally cure. Is this a miracle, They told me Schizophrenia can never be cure, can professional here explain this to me. The Herbal medication I use for my son worked perfectly on him and now I have peace at home now, My son is finally healed. If you have someone with a chronic type of Schizophrenia, contact Dr. Justin with this e-mail (rodwenhill080@gmail.com)

    ReplyDelete
  8. I decided to share this to help someone out there who is still held with schizophrenia.
    My son suffered from chronic schizophrenia for 18 years and we travelled round the world from one hospital to another neurologist and spent thousands of dollars and even got scammed in ths process of seeking a cure and the peroblem still persisted. He acted weird and aggresive and this was so scary. All thanks to Dr Joseph who was able to use his medicine to cure him permanently. He is one of the Honest men out there. If you want to contact him on how to get his medicine or for info just reach him directly on josephalberteo@gmail.com Thanks admin.

    ReplyDelete

Add a comment. Registration required because trolls.